Activist Judges in Iowa?
I've always hated the term "activist judge" because it seems like a pretty bogus argument to lay on someone who was voted in by the people, most likely after receiving high marks from whatever bar association, and in some cases approved by whatever state legislature, even the U.S. Congress!
But, time and again it shows up when people - on the losing side - think a judge has overstepped his or her bounds.
The gay marriage issue has bestowed this title on many a judge, usually in such liberal states as California, Vermont, New Jersey, etc. etc. Anti-evolution people peppered some Pennsylvania judges with this title, too.
How fitting, no? That they are so against it that thinking isn't even allowed to evolve, unless it's regression to their thoughts.
But, today, a lower district court in Iowa - yes, Iowa - has ruled that same-sex couples should be allowed to marry and that current state laws violate the rights of Iowa's citizens.
If Iowa can come to its senses, how long before other states rectify laws discriminating against some people?
Actually, I don't see it changing very quickly. This is the same country that still had a state that barred interracial marriage as late as 2000. And when it was overturned, 40% of the voters still supported it.
So, to the activist judge crowd, keep it up. You'll be repeated yourself like an old, broken record for years to come.
In the meantime, I need to find something to listen to that drowns out the noise coming out of your mouths.







